The rubber band theorem
One day I had carried my sandwich to work in a box which I kept shut with two rubber bands. As I was fidgetting with the bands on the table, I noticed that if I tried to force one inside the other it formed an inward bulge:
I wondered if there were a mathematical explanation to it, and sure enough, there is!
In the language of differential geometry, the curvature of a rubber band can be defined as the instantaneous change in the angle made by the tangent vector to the band and some arbitrary axis (see figure below):

The formal definition is
where

An intuitive way to understand the above is to look at the angle
The curvature at a point is then the inverse of the radius of curvature of the tangent circle at a point.
This definition reveals a very elegant result: the integral of the curvature along a closed curve (the total curvature) is:
where
Letās check this result for a few cases. Eq.
where
Hence the total length of the curve is:
while the curvature writes:
This new expression does not alter the formula for the total curvature:
Restricting our attention to the 2d plane, we have
Then:
so that:
This is the more practical expression for the curvature that we were looking for. We are now ready to look at a few examples.
The circle
We choose
and its integral gives
The ellipse
We can parametrise the ellipse as :
which integrates to
The Nyquist curve

This example is a bit more complex. The curve winds twice on itself and is parametrised as
Using this, the total curvature can be computed to be :
as expected for a curve with a winding number
Now that we have convinced ourselves of the validity of Eq.
As the inner rubber band is forced within the contour of the other, its curvature must be bigger on a large portion of the curve (more positive). However, as the total curvature must remain equal to
As it turns out, there is a way of getting one rubber band inside the other without the bulge, you just need to increase the winding number:
